POLARIS

Logistics · Problem brief

On-Time Delivery Is Declining

DIRECT ANSWERReconstruct each order from customer promise through release, pick, pack, carrier handoff and delivery. Measure lateness against the promise the customer actually received, then separate planning error from execution delay by stage and lane. Test one controllable handoff or promise rule on a bounded route without hiding late orders through looser dates.

Updated September 28, 2026Diagnosis · Evidence · First proof

Start with these five checks.

Ask for only what can change the answer.

Test one reversible move.

Select one high-volume lane with a supported handoff delay. Change one cutoff, tender or dispatch rule for a limited cohort and compare on-time-in-full, cost and exceptions with matched orders. Preserve the original customer promise in measurement; stop if cost or incomplete delivery exceeds the guardrail.

A decision your team can use.

Common questions.

Which date defines on time?

Use the promise shown to the customer, with any later re-promise reported separately.

Can carrier data answer the whole problem?

No. Release, warehouse and tender delays can occur before carrier custody.

Should promised dates simply be extended?

Only if the promise is structurally unrealistic; changing the date can hide an execution failure.

Authoritative references.

  1. ASCM, SCOR Digital Standard
  2. U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Freight Facts and Figures

Tell Polaris what changed. We’ll find what to prove first.

TELL US THE PROBLEM ↗